This is lif-viz's built-in Example Job, generated from synthetic demonstration data. Nothing here is a real site. It never expires.

Example Job

How is this image generated? ↗

Drag to rotate, shift-click drag to pan, scroll to zoom.

Image Controls

?
Color scheme
Gamma value
More options
Boring label size
Glyph size

Colorbar

Label size
Colorbar size
Position

Colors are %RE estimated between borings. Blank areas are either below the threshold or too far from the borings to estimate. 3D vertical scale is exaggerated 3×.

Audit Report

WARN 3 checks need attention ?
⚠ depth_gap [SB-03]: Largest depth gap is 48.8 cm (1.6 ft), from 304.8 to 353.6 cm (10.0-11.6 ft), over the 15.0 cm (0.5 ft) threshold. Left as a gap; no readings are filled in.⚠ duplicate_depth_record [SB-02]: 1 depth value(s) appear more than once: 182.9 cm (6.00 ft). At each, the reading with the highest %RE is kept.⚠ missing_channel_data [SB-02]: 11 of 562 records missing at least one channel value. Left blank, not set to zero.
View full report
Audit report: Example Job
Overall: WARN

✓ boring_count: 10 borings, all boring_id values unique.
✓ depth_coverage [SB-01]: 481 records, depth 0.0-731.5 cm (0.0-24.0 ft).
✓ depth_coverage [SB-02]: 562 records, depth 0.0-853.4 cm (0.0-28.0 ft).
✓ depth_coverage [SB-03]: 370 records, depth 0.0-609.6 cm (0.0-20.0 ft).
✓ depth_coverage [SB-04]: 441 records, depth 0.0-670.6 cm (0.0-22.0 ft).
✓ depth_coverage [SB-05]: 461 records, depth 0.0-701.0 cm (0.0-23.0 ft).
✓ depth_coverage [SB-06]: 431 records, depth 0.0-655.3 cm (0.0-21.5 ft).
✓ depth_coverage [SB-07]: 501 records, depth 0.0-762.0 cm (0.0-25.0 ft).
✓ depth_coverage [SB-08]: 451 records, depth 0.0-685.8 cm (0.0-22.5 ft).
✓ depth_coverage [SB-09]: 521 records, depth 0.0-792.5 cm (0.0-26.0 ft).
✓ depth_coverage [SB-10]: 481 records, depth 0.0-731.5 cm (0.0-24.0 ft).
✓ depth_gap [SB-01]: No depth gap exceeds 15.0 cm (0.5 ft).
✓ depth_gap [SB-02]: No depth gap exceeds 15.0 cm (0.5 ft).
⚠ depth_gap [SB-03]: Largest depth gap is 48.8 cm (1.6 ft), from 304.8 to 353.6 cm (10.0-11.6 ft), over the 15.0 cm (0.5 ft) threshold. Left as a gap; no readings are filled in.
✓ depth_gap [SB-04]: No depth gap exceeds 15.0 cm (0.5 ft).
✓ depth_gap [SB-05]: No depth gap exceeds 15.0 cm (0.5 ft).
✓ depth_gap [SB-06]: No depth gap exceeds 15.0 cm (0.5 ft).
✓ depth_gap [SB-07]: No depth gap exceeds 15.0 cm (0.5 ft).
✓ depth_gap [SB-08]: No depth gap exceeds 15.0 cm (0.5 ft).
✓ depth_gap [SB-09]: No depth gap exceeds 15.0 cm (0.5 ft).
✓ depth_gap [SB-10]: No depth gap exceeds 15.0 cm (0.5 ft).
✓ channel_consistency [SB-01]: Consistent channel layout: ['ch1', 'ch2', 'ch3', 'ch4'].
✓ channel_consistency [SB-02]: Consistent channel layout: ['ch1', 'ch2', 'ch3', 'ch4'].
✓ channel_consistency [SB-03]: Consistent channel layout: ['ch1', 'ch2', 'ch3', 'ch4'].
✓ channel_consistency [SB-04]: Consistent channel layout: ['ch1', 'ch2', 'ch3', 'ch4'].
✓ channel_consistency [SB-05]: Consistent channel layout: ['ch1', 'ch2', 'ch3', 'ch4'].
✓ channel_consistency [SB-06]: Consistent channel layout: ['ch1', 'ch2', 'ch3', 'ch4'].
✓ channel_consistency [SB-07]: Consistent channel layout: ['ch1', 'ch2', 'ch3', 'ch4'].
✓ channel_consistency [SB-08]: Consistent channel layout: ['ch1', 'ch2', 'ch3', 'ch4'].
✓ channel_consistency [SB-09]: Consistent channel layout: ['ch1', 'ch2', 'ch3', 'ch4'].
✓ channel_consistency [SB-10]: Consistent channel layout: ['ch1', 'ch2', 'ch3', 'ch4'].
✓ pct_re_sanity [SB-01]: %RE range is 0-6.1, within plausible bounds.
✓ pct_re_sanity [SB-02]: %RE range is 0-653.8, within plausible bounds.
✓ pct_re_sanity [SB-03]: %RE range is 0-221.4, within plausible bounds.
✓ pct_re_sanity [SB-04]: %RE range is 0-5.8, within plausible bounds.
✓ pct_re_sanity [SB-05]: %RE range is 0-5.8, within plausible bounds.
✓ pct_re_sanity [SB-06]: %RE range is 0-6.1, within plausible bounds.
✓ pct_re_sanity [SB-07]: %RE range is 0-5.5, within plausible bounds.
✓ pct_re_sanity [SB-08]: %RE range is 0-6.2, within plausible bounds.
✓ pct_re_sanity [SB-09]: %RE range is 0-163.7, within plausible bounds.
✓ pct_re_sanity [SB-10]: %RE range is 0-37.8, within plausible bounds.
✓ duplicate_depth_record [SB-01]: No duplicate depth records.
⚠ duplicate_depth_record [SB-02]: 1 depth value(s) appear more than once: 182.9 cm (6.00 ft). At each, the reading with the highest %RE is kept.
✓ duplicate_depth_record [SB-03]: No duplicate depth records.
✓ duplicate_depth_record [SB-04]: No duplicate depth records.
✓ duplicate_depth_record [SB-05]: No duplicate depth records.
✓ duplicate_depth_record [SB-06]: No duplicate depth records.
✓ duplicate_depth_record [SB-07]: No duplicate depth records.
✓ duplicate_depth_record [SB-08]: No duplicate depth records.
✓ duplicate_depth_record [SB-09]: No duplicate depth records.
✓ duplicate_depth_record [SB-10]: No duplicate depth records.
✓ coordinate_completeness: 10 of 10 borings georeferenced.
✓ missing_channel_data [SB-01]: No missing channel values.
⚠ missing_channel_data [SB-02]: 11 of 562 records missing at least one channel value. Left blank, not set to zero.
✓ missing_channel_data [SB-03]: No missing channel values.
✓ missing_channel_data [SB-04]: No missing channel values.
✓ missing_channel_data [SB-05]: No missing channel values.
✓ missing_channel_data [SB-06]: No missing channel values.
✓ missing_channel_data [SB-07]: No missing channel values.
✓ missing_channel_data [SB-08]: No missing channel values.
✓ missing_channel_data [SB-09]: No missing channel values.
✓ missing_channel_data [SB-10]: No missing channel values.
✓ coincident_borings: No coincident boring locations.
✓ interpolation_coverage: 10 borings with coordinates available for 3D.
✓ collinear_borings: Borings are not all on one line.
✓ site_image_overlap: Every boring falls within the site image.

What was changed after this audit, before anything was plotted:
- Duplicate depths: at each, the reading with the highest %RE was kept
  and the others dropped.
- Depth gaps: left as gaps. No reading was filled in.
- Missing channel values: left blank, not set to zero.
Nothing else in the data was changed. Depths are below ground surface.

Cleaned Dataset

?

Boring Logs

  1. SB-01 peak 6.1 %RE · Mar 11, 9:25 AM
    Boring log: SB-01
  2. SB-02 peak 653.8 %RE · Mar 11, 11:05 AM
    Boring log: SB-02
  3. SB-03 peak 221.4 %RE · Mar 11, 8:40 AM
    Boring log: SB-03
  4. SB-04 peak 5.8 %RE · Mar 11, 10:15 AM
    Boring log: SB-04
  5. SB-05 peak 5.8 %RE · Mar 12, 9:20 AM
    Boring log: SB-05
  6. SB-06 peak 6.1 %RE · Mar 12, 11:00 AM
    Boring log: SB-06
  7. SB-07 peak 5.5 %RE · Mar 12, 8:35 AM
    Boring log: SB-07
  8. SB-08 peak 6.2 %RE · Mar 12, 10:10 AM
    Boring log: SB-08
  9. SB-09 peak 163.7 %RE · Mar 13, 9:35 AM
    Boring log: SB-09
  10. SB-10 peak 37.8 %RE · Mar 13, 8:45 AM
    Boring log: SB-10

10 logs. Scroll sideways or use the arrows; click a log to open it full size.

Depth in feet (meters on the right), the same range on every log; %RE is scaled to each log's own peak.

Estimated Volume

?

Estimates for scale, not a design quantity: flat ground, no error band. What is counted

Before you share this link

  • Anyone with this link can view this job's full results — no login required.
  • This can't be undone: once you share it, access can't be revoked.
  • This is the Example Job — this link never expires.